Employment Relations FAQs
ask a question.
       
 
find out about:
""
fact sheets
""
publications
""
order a publication
""
Employment Case Summary
""
EMPLOYMENT CASES SUMMARY April 2007 - Table of Contents
""
Compensation and Cost Award Tables
ER Info

Arrears - April 2007

 
 

Previous Section | Table of Contents | Next Section

Vukomanovic v Sportzone Sports Ltd

7 Aug 2006, G Wood, WA 112/06, (10 pages)

UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Serious misconduct - Summary dismissal - Applicant employed to fundraise for community soccer projects - Second respondent ("M") director of first respondent ("S") - M concerned following comments from soccer community about applicant's behaviour - M alleged applicant took business cards believing were season tickets and intended to sell them - Dismissed applicant without raising concerns - Insufficient evidence supporting serious allegation applicant sought to profit from cards - S accepted procedures in dismissing not those of fair and reasonable employer - However, claimed had good cause to dismiss - No procedural steps taken - No substantive ground existed that would have led fair and reasonable employer to dismiss - Applicant had difficulties with English - Issues of communication should have been worked through - Remedies - S in bad financial position - Could not afford to employ applicant - In all circumstances reinstatement impracticable - ARREARS OF WAGES - Failed to pay final pay - Parties agreed to pay rise but no increase ever paid - Agreement subject to implied condition fundraising successful - Fundraising unsuccessful, therefore entitled to wages at original rate - PENALTY - S breached duty by withholding final pay - M not personally liable as acted at all times as director - No good purpose served in paying penalty to Crown - Length of service 11 months - Project Leader

Result: Application granted (Unjustified dismissal) ; Reimbursement of lost wages (three months) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($2,500) ; Arrears of wages (Quantum to be determined) ; Application dismissed (Penalty) ; Disbursements ($70)(Filing fee)

Arrears - Holiday Pay

Booker (Labour Inspector) v Gill t/a Gills Cleaning Services

15 Sep 2006, V Campbell, AA 294/06, (3 pages)

ARREARS OF HOLIDAY PAY - Applicant Labour Inspector sought holiday pay, interest, penalty and costs - Outstanding holiday pay owed upon termination of employment - No appearance by respondent - No good cause for failure to attend - Authority satisfied respondent served notice of investigation meeting - Respondent failed to keep or produce wage and time records - Prejudiced applicant's ability to bring accurate claim - Arrears of holiday pay due and owing - Interest 8.5 percent - Applicant directed to serve copy of determination on respondent forthwith - PENALTY - Respondent in breach of ERA s130 2000 for failure to keep wage and time records - Appropriate penalty be imposed - COSTS - Applicant entitled to filing fee - Cleaner

Result: Application granted ; Arrears of holiday pay ($555.69)(Payable to Labour Inspector) ; Interest (8.5%) ; Penalty ($250)(Payable to Crown) ; Orders accordingly ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($70)(Filing fee)

Gilbert v EDI Electrical Ltd

28 Feb 2007, J Cricthon, CA 20/07, (8 pages)

UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Applicant received sports injury - Return to work delayed as injury took longer to heal than anticipated - Applicant attempted to contact respondent on cell phone about progress and left medical certificates in mail box - Parties had no other contact - Respondent claimed applicant told not to call cell phone and regularly did not listen to messages - On recovery applicant returned to work with father and claimed told no job for him - Respondent claimed said was no work at that time - Whether dismissed - Respondent had responsibility to ensure applicant clear no work available "at present" - Took no steps to disabuse applicant of view had lost job - Authority not satisfied parties did all could have done to communicate - Applicant and father interpreted meeting as dismissal - On balance of probabilities not persuaded dismissal did not occur - Unjustified dismissal - UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - Respondent failed to deal prudently and sensibly with absence of information - Respondent in stronger position - Had duty to take all reasonable steps to ensure information required from applicant provided - Unjustified action - Also disadvantaged by respondent's delay in complying with request by ACC for information - Due to unreasonable delay earnings related compensation payment delayed - Unjustified disadvantage - Remedies - Applicant failed to pursue other means of contacting respondent - Obliged to alert prolonged absence and explain basis for it - Contributory conduct 10 per cent - ARREARS OF HOLIDAY PAY - Respondent claimed agreement applicant would receive sick pay prior to entitlement but if left job within six months would forfeit right to holiday pay - No evidence agreement existed - However, such agreement without force as avoided effect of minimum rights in Holidays Act 2003 - Arrears due and owing - Length of service three months one week - Electrical technician

Result: Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($7,411.69) ; Compensation for humiliation etc (Unjustified dismissal)($5,000 reduced to $4,500) ; (Unjustified disadvantage)($4,000 reduced to $3,600) ; Arrears of holiday pay (Quantum to be determined) ; Costs reserved

Previous Section | Table of Contents | Next Section



publications order form

home | holidays | pay | good faith | union matters | education & training | fact sheets | publications | parental leave | employment agreements | problem solving | collective bargaining

search our FAQs | sitemap | contact us | about this site | about ers | related sites | govt.nz

©2004 copyright | disclaimer | privacy statement | comment on this website | accessibility

Department of Labour.