Employment Relations FAQs
ask a question.
       
 
find out about:
""
fact sheets
""
publications
""
order a publication
""
Employment Case Summary
""
EMPLOYMENT CASES SUMMARY November 2007 - Table of Contents
""
Compensation and Cost Award Tables
ER Info

Personal Grievance - Dismissal - Redundancy - Employment Relations Act 2000

 
 

Previous Section | Table of Contents | Next Section

McGregor v Mobil Oil New Zealand Ltd

2 May 2007, D Asher, WA 69/07, (8 pages)

UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - Redundancy - During employment applicant took extensive paid sick leave – While on leave advised respondent proposed restructuring that would see operations shifting to Bangkok - Also claimed advised work had been redistributed to other team members and job "gone" - On return applicant required to do project work - Presented with fait accompli and left with little option but to accept work - Postponement of project resulted in redundancy of applicant's position - Advised redundant unless another position could be found - Efforts to redeploy unsuccessful - Applicant properly did not contest substantive genuineness of redundancy but rather when it should have occurred - Claimed respondent’s actions caused her to go on further sick leave until date of redundancy - Given extent of applicant's absences, not unreasonable for respondent to redistribute work - However, it failed to take account of consequences of redistribution when project postponed - Also breached undertaking to give at least two months notice prior to redundancy - No evidence respondent set out to deliberately mislead or deceive applicant - Election and implementation of redundancy decision made without consultation - Unjustifiably disadvantaged and dismissed as result of failure to consult at time elected to postpone project - Election resulted in unilateral decision to terminate - Failure to consult was significant breach of s4(1A)(c) Employment Relations Act 2000 - Dismissal unjustified - Remedies - Applicant claimed medical problems attributable to respondent's actions - Sought medical costs - No reliable evidence actions responsible and sick leave taken for other reasons - Respondent not totally liable for applicant's inability to work and loss of earnings - Not certain applicant's employment would have continued had fair process been followed - Applicant to receive three month lost wages inclusive of additional one month's notice - Accounts clerk

Result: Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages (3 weeks)(Quantum to be determined) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($8,000) ; Leave reserved to return to Authority to determine quantum of lost wages ; Costs reserved

Previous Section | Table of Contents | Next Section



publications order form

home | holidays | pay | good faith | union matters | education & training | fact sheets | publications | parental leave | employment agreements | problem solving | collective bargaining

search our FAQs | sitemap | contact us | about this site | about ers | related sites | govt.nz

©2004 copyright | disclaimer | privacy statement | comment on this website | accessibility

Department of Labour.