Employment Relations FAQs
ask a question.
       
 
find out about:
""
fact sheets
""
publications
""
order a publication
""
Employment Case Summary
""
Employment Case Summary November 2008 - Table of Contents
""
Compensation and Cost Award Tables
ER Info

Employment Cases Summary November 2008

 
 

Personal Grievance - Raising of Personal Grievance - Employment Relations Act 2000

A v Auckland City Council
29 Sep 2008, J Wilson, AA 342/08, (14 pages)
UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – RAISING PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – Whether grievance raised within 90 days - Applicant claimed disadvantaged in employment due to sexual harassment victimisation and bullying by colleague (“Z”) – Applicant propositioned by Z for sex and claimed that after incident Z used position to bully and victimise applicant – Applicant did not report incident nor allegations of bullying until five years after incident occurred - Authority found grievance not raised within 90 days – Disadvantage grievance dismissed - UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Redundancy – Applicant claimed Z played major part in applicant’s redundancy – Respondent developed new management strategy – Two new positions replaced applicant’s position – Authority found new positions substantially different from applicant’s old position – Respondent told applicant to apply for new positions – Applicant believed was deliberately excluded from applying for positions due to minimum requirements advertised and not encouraged to apply – Applicant raised grievance, and communications became more formal – Authority found incident coloured relationship between applicant and Z – However, found Z did not play role in final redundancy decision – Found full consultation took place – Applicant genuinely redundant and process fair – However, Authority found way defendant managed applicant’s departure fell short of what fair and reasonable employer would have done – Found defendant did not meet obligation under s1A(b) Employment Relations Act 2000 to be constructive and communicative – Found although applicant did not seek defendant’s advice on applying, applicant should have been fully informed and supported throughout process – Dismissal unjustified - Remedies – No contributory conduct – Due to respondent’s inaction, applicant suffered stress, hurt and humiliation greater than would otherwise have suffered – Compensation appropriate
Result: Application granted (dismissal) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($6,000) ; Application dismissed (disadvantage) ; Costs reserved


publications order form

home | holidays | pay | good faith | union matters | education & training | fact sheets | publications | parental leave | employment agreements | problem solving | collective bargaining

search our FAQs | sitemap | contact us | about this site | about ers | related sites | govt.nz

©2004 copyright | disclaimer | privacy statement | comment on this website | accessibility

Department of Labour.